Guy Edmond Weir v. Jerome J. Gordon

Sixth Circuit

Guy Edmond Weir v. Jerome J. Gordon

216 F.2d 508, 104 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 40, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4681

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 6, 1954·No. 11995·Published·Cited by 18 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this action for copyright infringement the district court, 111 F.Supp. 117, found that the appellant made copies of the principal features of the appellee’s copyrighted advertising material, and caused the same to be published for his own profit. We find that the district court’s controlling findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and that the court correctly applied the law. Ansehl v. Puritan Pharmaceutical Co., 8 Cir., 1932, 61 F.2d 131. It follows that the judgment of the district court should be and it hereby is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this action for copyright infringement the district court, 111 F.Supp. 117, found that the appellant made copies of the principal features of the appellee’s copyrighted advertising material, and caused the same to be published for his own profit. We find that the district court’s controlling findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and that the court correctly applied the law. Ansehl v. Puritan Pharmaceutical Co., 8 Cir., 1932, 61 F.2d 131. It follows that the judgment of the district court should be and it hereby is affirmed.

Guy Edmond Weir v. Jerome J. Gordon, 216 F.2d 508, 104 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 40, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4681 (6th Cir. 1954).

Pincite

216 F.2d 508 (Guy Edmond Weir v. Jerome J. Gordon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.