Guy B. Barham Co. v. United States
This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 1033 (Guy B. Barham Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of rattancore coolie hat planters, sleighs, modern shaped trays, serving trays, snack trays, and hanging planters similar in all material respects to those the subject of Royal Cathay Trading Co. and W. J. Byrnes & Co. et al. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 371, C.D. 2662); that the items of merchandise marked “C” consist of rattancore and reed Kleenex tissue box covers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Quon Quon Company v. United States (41 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2038); that the items of merchandise marked “F” consist of rattan suitcases and valises similar in all material respects to those the subject of Royal Cathay Trading Co. and W. J. Byrnes & Co. v. United States (45 Cust. Ct. 99, C.D. 2206); and that the items of merchandise marked “G” consist of trays, serving trays, display trees, etc., which are in no part of rattan, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Quon Quon Company v. United States (48 Cust. Ct. 440, Abstract 66729), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 Cust. Ct. 1033, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guy-b-barham-co-v-united-states-cusc-1968.