Gutwirth v. Carewell Trading Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gutwirth v. Carewell Trading Corp.

12 A.D.2d 920, 211 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12456

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 23, 1961

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 A.D.2d 920 (Gutwirth v. Carewell Trading Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gutwirth v. Carewell Trading Corp., 12 A.D.2d 920, 211 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12456 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to defendants-respondents. We agree with the findings of the trial court to the effect that there was no diversion of funds on the part of defendants, and that plaintiff had full knowledge of and consented to all of the acts of which he now complains. In the circumstances the plaintiff may not recover whether it be in an action at law or in equity for an accounting. The findings of the arbitrators were not binding upon the court because the arbitrators did not pass upon the relationship between the partners and the corporation for the period encompassed by the court’s decision. In view of the above we need not pass on any of the other issues raised. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to defendants-respondents. We agree with the findings of the trial court to the effect that there was no diversion of funds on the part of defendants, and that plaintiff had full knowledge of and consented to all of the acts of which he now complains. In the circumstances the plaintiff may not recover whether it be in an action at law or in equity for an accounting. The findings of the arbitrators were not binding upon the court because the arbitrators did not pass upon the relationship between the partners and the corporation for the period encompassed by the court’s decision. In view of the above we need not pass on any of the other issues raised. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 920, 211 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gutwirth-v-carewell-trading-corp-nyappdiv-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack