Guttman v. Abbott
This text of 110 N.Y.S. 376 (Guttman v. Abbott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action was brought upon a promissory note made by the defendant Emil B. Abbott to the order of the plaintiff, and indorsed by the defendant Oscar B. Abbott before delivery. Judgment was rendered for the amount of the note, with interest and costs, from which judgment the defendant Oscar B. Abbott appeals.
He was called as a witness upon the trial, and testified without contradiction that he received no notice of protest or presentation of the note for payment. His obligation as an indorser was, of course, contingent on the failure of the maker to pay at maturity the due protest of the note, and notice thereof to him. Fuller Buggy Co. v. Waldron, 113 App. Div. 814, 99 N. Y. Supp. 561.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 N.Y.S. 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guttman-v-abbott-nyappterm-1908.