Gutterman v. Caliguiri

96 A.D.3d 519, 945 N.Y.S.2d 879

This text of 96 A.D.3d 519 (Gutterman v. Caliguiri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gutterman v. Caliguiri, 96 A.D.3d 519, 945 N.Y.S.2d 879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered May 24, 2011, denying petitioners’ motion to vacate an arbitration award, and confirming the award, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioners failed to establish that the award was irrational (see Kalyanaram v New York Inst. of Tech., 79 AD3d 418, 419-420 [2010], lv denied 17 NY3d 712 [2011]).

We have considered petitioners’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2011 NY Slip Op 30855(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 A.D.3d 519, 945 N.Y.S.2d 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gutterman-v-caliguiri-nyappdiv-2012.