Gutshall v. Carpenter

37 Colo. 536
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedApril 15, 1906
DocketNo. 4862
StatusPublished

This text of 37 Colo. 536 (Gutshall v. Carpenter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gutshall v. Carpenter, 37 Colo. 536 (Colo. 1906).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

-The questions presented by this appeal have been settled by the previous decisions of this court in Irrigation Co. v. Water S. & S. Co., 29 Colo. 469; Fluke v. Ford, 35 Colo. 112; New Cache la Poudre Irrigating Co. v. Arthur Irrigation Co., ante, page 530; Ashenfelter v. Carpenter, ante, page 534.

The judgment of tbe district court is in accordance with the views expressed in these cases, and will, therefore, be affirmed, without prejudice to appellant to maintain a proceeding in accordance with the act of 1899 (Sess. Laws 1899, 235) and the act of 1903 (Sess. Laws 1903, 278).

Decision en banc. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New Cache la Poudre Irrigation Co. v. Water Supply & Storage Co.
29 Colo. 469 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1902)
Fluke v. Ford
35 Colo. 112 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 Colo. 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gutshall-v-carpenter-colo-1906.