Gutman v. Rosenbloom

215 A.D. 717

This text of 215 A.D. 717 (Gutman v. Rosenbloom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gutman v. Rosenbloom, 215 A.D. 717 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. We are of opinion that the extension of the step one and one-half to three inches beyond the posts into the sidewalk did not constitute negligence, and as it does not affirmatively appear that the worn portion of the step, one-half inch in depth, was the cause of plaintiff’s fall, the verdict of the jury is against the weight of the evidence. (Greenberg v. Schlanger, 229 N. Y. 120, 122.) Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur; Kelly, P. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greenberg v. . Schlanger
127 N.E. 896 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 A.D. 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gutman-v-rosenbloom-nyappdiv-1925.