Gutierrez v. Weinstein

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gutierrez v. Weinstein

409 So. 2d 1110, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19174

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 2, 1982

DocketNo. 81-564

StatusPublished

This text of 409 So. 2d 1110 (Gutierrez v. Weinstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gutierrez v. Weinstein, 409 So. 2d 1110, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19174 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

BASKIN, Judge.

We affirm the summary judgment entered by the trial court. We note that a court order is entitled to a presumption of correctness. See Phillips v. Phillips, 146 Fla. 311, 1 So.2d 186 (1941). Appellees’ reliance upon the judgment was shown by [1111]*1111the record to have been the result of a mutual mistake, which was later corrected by the court, and not the result of negligence.

Appellants’ remaining' points lack merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BASKIN, Judge.

We affirm the summary judgment entered by the trial court. We note that a court order is entitled to a presumption of correctness. See Phillips v. Phillips, 146 Fla. 311, 1 So.2d 186 (1941). Appellees’ reliance upon the judgment was shown by [1111]*1111the record to have been the result of a mutual mistake, which was later corrected by the court, and not the result of negligence.

Appellants’ remaining' points lack merit.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

409 So. 2d 1110, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gutierrez-v-weinstein-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack