Gutierrez v. Weinstein

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gutierrez v. Weinstein

409 So. 2d 1110, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19174

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 2, 1982·No. No. 81-564·Published

Opinion

BASKIN, Judge.

We affirm the summary judgment entered by the trial court. We note that a court order is entitled to a presumption of correctness. See Phillips v. Phillips, 146 Fla. 311, 1 So.2d 186 (1941). Appellees’ reliance upon the judgment was shown by [1111] the record to have been the result of a mutual mistake, which was later corrected by the court, and not the result of negligence.

Appellants’ remaining' points lack merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BASKIN, Judge.

We affirm the summary judgment entered by the trial court. We note that a court order is entitled to a presumption of correctness. See Phillips v. Phillips, 146 Fla. 311, 1 So.2d 186 (1941). Appellees’ reliance upon the judgment was shown by [1111] the record to have been the result of a mutual mistake, which was later corrected by the court, and not the result of negligence.

Appellants’ remaining' points lack merit.

Affirmed.

Gutierrez v. Weinstein, 409 So. 2d 1110, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19174 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

409 So. 2d 1110 (Gutierrez v. Weinstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related