Gutierrez v. United States
This text of 177 F. App'x 510 (Gutierrez v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Carlos Gutierrez was convicted after a jury trial of four drug offenses and was sentenced to 360 months. His convictions and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal. See United States v. Gutierrez, 367 F.3d 733 (8th Cir.2004). Subsequent to his sentencing the United States Supreme Court decided Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) , and by this motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Gutierrez seeks their application to his sentence. The district court1 denied relief but granted a certificate of appealability. Since Blakely and Booker do not apply retroactively, Gutierrez is not entitled to the ruling he seeks. See Never Misses A Shot v. United States, 413 F.3d 781 (8th Cir.2005) (per curiam). Accordingly, we affirm the judgement of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 F. App'x 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gutierrez-v-united-states-ca8-2006.