Gutierrez v. United States

177 F. App'x 510
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 24, 2006·No. No. 05-2957·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Carlos Gutierrez was convicted after a jury trial of four drug offenses and was sentenced to 360 months. His convictions and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal. See United States v. Gutierrez, 367 F.3d 733 (8th Cir.2004). Subsequent to his sentencing the United States Supreme Court decided Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) , and by this motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Gutierrez seeks their application to his sentence. The district court1 denied relief but granted a certificate of appealability. Since Blakely and Booker do not apply retroactively, Gutierrez is not entitled to the ruling he seeks. See Never Misses A Shot v. United States, 413 F.3d 781 (8th Cir.2005) (per curiam). Accordingly, we affirm the judgement of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gutierrez v. United States, 177 F. App'x 510 (8th Cir. 2006).

177 F. App'x 510 (Gutierrez v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blakely v. Washington
542 U.S. 296 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Carlos Gutierrez
367 F.3d 733 (Eighth Circuit, 2004)
Lenford Never Misses a Shot v. United States
413 F.3d 781 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)