Gutierrez v. State

110 So. 3d 502, 2013 WL 1222704, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4905
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 27, 2013
DocketNo. 4D12-3266
StatusPublished

This text of 110 So. 3d 502 (Gutierrez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gutierrez v. State, 110 So. 3d 502, 2013 WL 1222704, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4905 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s untimely motion for postconviction relief. See State v. Green, 944 So.2d 208 (Fla.2006). Appellant failed to establish any valid exception to the time limitation. Further, Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively to convictions which were final at the time that decision issued. Chaidez v. United States, — U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 1103, 185 L.Ed.2d 149 (2013); Hernandez v. State, — So.3d —(Fla.2012).

Affirmed.

GROSS, GERBER and CONNER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Chaidez v. United States
133 S. Ct. 1103 (Supreme Court, 2013)
State v. Green
944 So. 2d 208 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 So. 3d 502, 2013 WL 1222704, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gutierrez-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.