Gutierrez v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gutierrez v. Safir

280 A.D.2d 263, 721 N.Y.S.2d 7, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 866

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 1, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 280 A.D.2d 263 (Gutierrez v. Safir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gutierrez v. Safir, 280 A.D.2d 263, 721 N.Y.S.2d 7, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered June 11, 1999, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent Police Department’s denial of petitioner’s application for a pistol permit, and directed entry of judgment dismissing the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent’s rejection of petitioner’s application for a pistol [264]*264permit was rationally based upon respondent’s relatively recent rejection of petitioner’s application to become a police officer for psychological reasons, numerous summonses issued to petitioner for moving traffic violations, and information in those summonses regarding petitioner’s prior addresses that was not consistent with information he provided in the pistol permit application (Penal Law § 400.00 [1] [former (f)]). Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered June 11, 1999, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent Police Department’s denial of petitioner’s application for a pistol permit, and directed entry of judgment dismissing the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent’s rejection of petitioner’s application for a pistol [264]*264permit was rationally based upon respondent’s relatively recent rejection of petitioner’s application to become a police officer for psychological reasons, numerous summonses issued to petitioner for moving traffic violations, and information in those summonses regarding petitioner’s prior addresses that was not consistent with information he provided in the pistol permit application (Penal Law § 400.00 [1] [former (f)]). Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 A.D.2d 263, 721 N.Y.S.2d 7, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gutierrez-v-safir-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack