Gutierrez v. Marcello's Chop house

D. New Mexico

Gutierrez v. Marcello's Chop house

District Court, D. New Mexico·Decided January 29, 2021·No. 1:19-cv-00124·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO MICHELLE GUTIERREZ, Plaintiff, VS. Civ. No. 19-124 JCH/JIFR MARCELLO’S CHOPHOUSE, et al., Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommended Disposition by United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar, filed December 18, 2020. Doc. 75. Objections were due by no later than January 4, 2021. The parties have not filed any objections. The failure to make timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions. U.S. v. One Parcel of Real Property, 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10% Cir. 1996). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 75) are ADOPTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file the Amended Complaint, excluding Counts II, IV and VI, in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s Orders.

AED Coe

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO MICHELLE GUTIERREZ, Plaintiff, VS. Civ. No. 19-124 JCH/JIFR MARCELLO’S CHOPHOUSE, et al., Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommended Disposition by United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar, filed December 18, 2020. Doc. 75. Objections were due by no later than January 4, 2021. The parties have not filed any objections. The failure to make timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions. U.S. v. One Parcel of Real Property, 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10% Cir. 1996). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 75) are ADOPTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file the Amended Complaint, excluding Counts II, IV and VI, in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s Orders.

AED Coe

Gutierrez v. Marcello's Chop house, (D.N.M. 2021).

Pincite

Gutierrez v. Marcello's Chop house (Gutierrez v. Marcello's Chop house) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.