Gutierrez v. Marcello's Chop house

D. New Mexico

Gutierrez v. Marcello's Chop house

DecidedJanuary 29, 2021

Docket1:19-cv-00124

StatusUnknown

This text of Gutierrez v. Marcello's Chop house (Gutierrez v. Marcello's Chop house) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gutierrez v. Marcello's Chop house, (D.N.M. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO MICHELLE GUTIERREZ, Plaintiff, VS. Civ. No. 19-124 JCH/JIFR MARCELLO’S CHOPHOUSE, et al., Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommended Disposition by United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar, filed December 18, 2020. Doc. 75. Objections were due by no later than January 4, 2021. The parties have not filed any objections. The failure to make timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions. U.S. v. One Parcel of Real Property, 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10% Cir. 1996). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 75) are ADOPTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file the Amended Complaint, excluding Counts II, IV and VI, in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s Orders.

AED Coe

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO MICHELLE GUTIERREZ, Plaintiff, VS. Civ. No. 19-124 JCH/JIFR MARCELLO’S CHOPHOUSE, et al., Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommended Disposition by United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar, filed December 18, 2020. Doc. 75. Objections were due by no later than January 4, 2021. The parties have not filed any objections. The failure to make timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions. U.S. v. One Parcel of Real Property, 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10% Cir. 1996). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 75) are ADOPTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file the Amended Complaint, excluding Counts II, IV and VI, in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s Orders.

AED Coe

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Gutierrez v. Marcello's Chop house, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gutierrez-v-marcellos-chop-house-nmd-2021.