Gutierrez v. Gonzales

222 F. App'x 607
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2007·No. No. 06-74151·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The agency did not abuse its discretion when it denied petitioner’s motion to reconsider as numerically and time barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(3). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gutierrez v. Gonzales, 222 F. App'x 607 (9th Cir. 2007).

222 F. App'x 607 (Gutierrez v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. James Lynn Hooton
693 F.2d 857 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)