Gutierrez v. Fajardo

District Court, D. New Mexico·Decided September 6, 2022·No. 2:19-cv-00436·Unknown

Opinion

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

ERIC GUTIERREZ,

Petitioner,

vs. CV 19-00436 RB/JHR

HECTOR BALDERAS, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico,

Respondent.1

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (PFRD) of Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter (Doc. 31), entered at the undersigned’s request pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). (See Doc. 9.) After analyzing the double jeopardy and the right to effective assistance of counsel claims, Judge Ritter recommends that the Court dismiss Petitioner Eric Gutierrez’s amended habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 with prejudice. (See Doc. 31.) The PFRD notified the parties of their ability to file objections and that failure to do so waives appellate review. (Id. at 9.) After several extensions, no objections have been filed and the time to do so has passed. (Id.; see also Docs. 32; 34; 36–37.) The failure to make timely objections to the PFRD waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions. See United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10th Cir. 1996). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Court:

1 The Court granted Respondents’ unopposed motion to dismiss warden David Fajardo as a respondent. (Doc. 27.) 1) ADOPTS the PFRD (Doc. 31); 2) DISMISSES with prejudice Gutierrez’s amended § 2254 petition (Doc. 19); and 3) DENIES issuing a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not reach a different result. IT IS SO ORDERED.

ROBERT C. A SENIOR US. TRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gutierrez v. Fajardo, (D.N.M. 2022).

Gutierrez v. Fajardo (Gutierrez v. Fajardo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. 2121 East 30th Street
73 F.3d 1057 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)