Gutierrez v. Baldwin

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ARMANDO GUTIERRREZ, ) Plaintiff, VS. Case No. 18-CV-1478-SMY JOHN BALDWIN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YANDLE, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly (Doc. 77), recommending the denial of Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanction (Doc. 69). No objections have been filed to the Report. For the following reasons, Judge Daly’s Report is ADOPTED. When neither timely nor specific objections to a Report and Recommendation are made, the Court need not conduct a de novo review of the Report. See Thomas vy. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Instead, the Court reviews the Report for clear error. Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). The Court may “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Here, Judge Daly thoroughly discussed and supported her conclusions that sanctions are not warranted in this matter. The Court finds no clear error in Judge Daly’s findings, analysis and conclusions, and adopts her Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion for sanctions (Doc. 69) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Kb b DATED: January 12, 2021

STACI M. YANDLE United States District Judge Page 1 of 1