Gutiérrez de Crosas v. Longpré Benítez

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Gutiérrez de Crosas v. Longpré Benítez

44 P.R. 654

CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico

DecidedMarch 16, 1933

DocketNo. 5185

StatusPublished

This text of 44 P.R. 654 (Gutiérrez de Crosas v. Longpré Benítez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gutiérrez de Crosas v. Longpré Benítez, 44 P.R. 654 (prsupreme 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Me. Justice Wole

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The considerations of the foregoing opinion, ■ante, p. 643, are applicable to the present suit. In addition we may say at the instance of the bank that none of the alleged blame could be imputed to it. The bank was merely a purchaser at the sale and can not be held to have espoused the alleged fault, blame or errors of the executing creditors. Hence the kind of action begun in this case did not lie against the bank.

Mr. Justice Hutchison concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Me. Justice Wole

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The considerations of the foregoing opinion, ■ante, p. 643, are applicable to the present suit. In addition we may say at the instance of the bank that none of the alleged blame could be imputed to it. The bank was merely a purchaser at the sale and can not be held to have espoused the alleged fault, blame or errors of the executing creditors. Hence the kind of action begun in this case did not lie against the bank.

Mr. Justice Hutchison concurs in the result.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 P.R. 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gutierrez-de-crosas-v-longpre-benitez-prsupreme-1933.