Gutierez v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Gutierez v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 438, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 317

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 29, 1953

DocketNo. 57287; protest 185948-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 30 Cust. Ct. 438 (Gutierez v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gutierez v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 438, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 317 (cusc 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, it was agreed that the statement made by the collector in his memorandum that the gown should have been entitled to free entry under paragraph 1615, supra, presented the facts in the case, and it was admitted in evidence. Counsel for the Government recommended that the allowance sought should be made. In view of the evidence presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, it was agreed that the statement made by the collector in his memorandum that the gown should have been entitled to free entry under paragraph 1615, supra, presented the facts in the case, and it was admitted in evidence. Counsel for the Government recommended that the allowance sought should be made. In view of the evidence presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 Cust. Ct. 438, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gutierez-v-united-states-cusc-1953.