Gutierez v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Gutierez v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 438, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 317

United States Customs Court·Decided April 29, 1953·No. No. 57287; protest 185948-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, it was agreed that the statement made by the collector in his memorandum that the gown should have been entitled to free entry under paragraph 1615, supra, presented the facts in the case, and it was admitted in evidence. Counsel for the Government recommended that the allowance sought should be made. In view of the evidence presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, it was agreed that the statement made by the collector in his memorandum that the gown should have been entitled to free entry under paragraph 1615, supra, presented the facts in the case, and it was admitted in evidence. Counsel for the Government recommended that the allowance sought should be made. In view of the evidence presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Gutierez v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 438, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 317 (cusc 1953).

Pincite

30 Cust. Ct. 438 (Gutierez v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.