Guthrie v. State

970 So. 2d 485, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 19785, 2007 WL 4355280
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Guthrie v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 962 So. 2d 352
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 14, 2007·No. No. 2D06-4910·Published

Opinion

VILLANTI, Judge.

Kelly Lynn Guthrie appeals a restitution order entered against her after she pleaded no contest to second-degree grand [486]*486theft. The restitution order requires her to pay a total of $34,190 to the victim of her crime. We find competent, substantial evidence supporting the order, with the exception of the amount of loss associated with certain Chrysler truck payments. Indeed, the victim himself testified that the amount included in evidence for the Chrysler payments was a mistake. Specifically, the evidence erroneously identified $3745.89 in Chrysler losses when it should have identified only $1191.26 in Chrysler losses. Because the court did not adjust the total amount of restitution to account for this admitted mistake, the court abused its discretion in awarding restitution of $34,190. Notably, the State rightfully concedes this error. Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand only to correct the total amount of restitution from $34,190 to $31,635.37. Ms. Guthrie does not need to be present at any hearing to make such correction. We affirm the order in all other respects.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

CASANUEVA and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guthrie v. State, 970 So. 2d 485, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 19785, 2007 WL 4355280 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

970 So. 2d 485 (Guthrie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.