Guthrie v. Ault

Supreme Court of Georgia

Guthrie v. Ault

190 S.E.2d 46, 229 Ga. 168, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 541

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 18, 1972

Docket27044

StatusPublished

This text of 190 S.E.2d 46 (Guthrie v. Ault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guthrie v. Ault, 190 S.E.2d 46, 229 Ga. 168, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 541 (Ga. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Gunter, Justice.

The appellant initiated a habeas corpus action in the trial court, and after a full hearing in the matter the trial judge rendered a judgment remanding the appellant to the custody of the warden. The appeal here is from that judgment.

We have carefully reviewed the record and transcript in both the habeas corpus court and the convicting court, and we conclude that none of the appellant’s constitutional rights has been violated, and that his confinement pursuant to his conviction is not illegal. [169]*169The trial court, therefore, did not commit error in its judgment remanding the petitioner to the custody of the warden.

Submitted February 14, 1972 Decided May 18, 1972. Arthur S. Guthrie, pro se. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Courtney Wilder Stanton, W. Hensell Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI