Guthrie v. Aetna Steel Co.

328 So. 2d 515, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14889
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 12, 1976·No. No. 75-872·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the amended complaint states a cause of action both in negligence (Count I) and implied warranty (Count II) and it was therefore error to dismiss the same with prejudice.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN, C. J., and OWEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guthrie v. Aetna Steel Co., 328 So. 2d 515, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14889 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

328 So. 2d 515 (Guthrie v. Aetna Steel Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oglesby v. Seminole County Bd. of Public Instruction
328 So. 2d 515 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)