Guthat v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Guthat v. State

567 So. 2d 403, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1049, 1990 WL 152217

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedAugust 24, 1990

DocketCR 89-189

StatusPublished

This text of 567 So. 2d 403 (Guthat v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guthat v. State, 567 So. 2d 403, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1049, 1990 WL 152217 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

BOWEN, Judge.

This is a pro se appeal from a guilty plea conviction for theft of property in the first degree.

The motion of the State is granted. The submission of this cause is set aside. This cause is remanded to the circuit court with directions that that court make a determination of whether or not the appellant is indigent. If the appellant is found to be indigent, the circuit court shall appoint counsel to. represent the appellant unless the appellant makes a voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver of counsel on the record. The circuit court shall make written findings and forward the same to this court without unreasonable delay.

SUBMISSION SET ASIDE; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BOWEN, Judge.

This is a pro se appeal from a guilty plea conviction for theft of property in the first degree.

The motion of the State is granted. The submission of this cause is set aside. This cause is remanded to the circuit court with directions that that court make a determination of whether or not the appellant is indigent. If the appellant is found to be indigent, the circuit court shall appoint counsel to. represent the appellant unless the appellant makes a voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver of counsel on the record. The circuit court shall make written findings and forward the same to this court without unreasonable delay.

SUBMISSION SET ASIDE; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

567 So. 2d 403, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1049, 1990 WL 152217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guthat-v-state-alacrimapp-1990.