Gutfur, Inc. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 356
United States Customs Court·Decided July 10, 1957·No. No. 61026; protests 51693-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinions

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lamb[357] skin plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, supra, the claim for free entry-under paragraph 1681 was sustained, except as to merchandise invoiced as “domestic cat plates” on the invoice accompanying entry 7768, covered by protest 101913-K, which was abandoned.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gutfur, Inc. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 356 (cusc 1957).

39 Cust. Ct. 356 (Gutfur, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 266 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)
A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States
33 Cust. Ct. 120 (U.S. Customs Court, 1954)
Prime Fur Corp. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 83 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)