Gutfrucht v. Federal National Mortgage Association

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 3, 2017
Docket2D16-711
StatusPublished

This text of Gutfrucht v. Federal National Mortgage Association (Gutfrucht v. Federal National Mortgage Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gutfrucht v. Federal National Mortgage Association, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ELLI GUTFRUCHT, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-711 ) FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ) ASSOCIATION; OCWEN LOAN ) SERVICING, LLC, as successor in ) interest to HOMEWARD RESIDENTIAL, ) INC. f/k/a AMERICAN HOME ) MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC.; RALF ) GUTFRUCHT; SHERWOOD AT THE ) CROSSROADS HOMEOWNERS ) ASSOCIATION, INC; and DEPARTMENT ) OF REVENUE, ) ) Appellees. ) )

Opinion filed November 3, 2017.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; James R. Thompson, Senior Judge and Elizabeth V. Krier, Judge.

Thomas Erskine Ice and Amanda L. Lundergran of Ice Appellate, Royal Palm Beach (withdrew after briefing), for Appellant.

Elli Gutfrucht, pro se.

David Rosenberg and Robert R. Edwards of Robertson, Anschutz & Schneid, PL, Boca Raton, for Appellee Federal National Mortgage Association. No appearance for remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Elli Gutfrucht appeals a final judgment of foreclosure in favor of Federal

National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae). We affirm without comment in all

respects save one. Fannie Mae has correctly conceded that the amount due stated in

the final judgment was mistakenly based on a principal amount of $384,309.89. Fannie

Mae's evidence was sufficient to show that the actual principal amount was $308,790.

Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment's computation of the amount due and

remand for the trial court to recalculate that sum based on the correct principal amount

and enter a judgment reflecting that amount. See, e.g., Messiha v. First Fla. Credit

Union, 139 So. 3d 376, 377 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (reversing and remanding for the

recalculation of the interest awarded in a final judgment of foreclosure where amount

awarded was based on a miscalculation).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with directions.

SILBERMAN, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Messiha v. First Florida Credit Union
139 So. 3d 376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gutfrucht v. Federal National Mortgage Association, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gutfrucht-v-federal-national-mortgage-association-fladistctapp-2017.