Guterman v. Dynamite Youth Center Foundation, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Guterman v. Dynamite Youth Center Foundation, Inc.

27 A.D.3d 619, 810 N.Y.S.2d 676

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.3d 619 (Guterman v. Dynamite Youth Center Foundation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guterman v. Dynamite Youth Center Foundation, Inc., 27 A.D.3d 619, 810 N.Y.S.2d 676 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Dynamite Youth Center Foundation, Inc., and James E. Schneider appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated February 9, 2005, as denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) to change venue from Kings County to Sullivan County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Considering all of the relevant factors, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion to change venue from Kings County to Sullivan County (see generally O’Brien v Vassar Bros. Hosp., 207 AD2d 169 [1995]). Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Dynamite Youth Center Foundation, Inc., and James E. Schneider appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated February 9, 2005, as denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) to change venue from Kings County to Sullivan County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Considering all of the relevant factors, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion to change venue from Kings County to Sullivan County (see generally O’Brien v Vassar Bros. Hosp., 207 AD2d 169 [1995]). Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.3d 619, 810 N.Y.S.2d 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guterman-v-dynamite-youth-center-foundation-inc-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack