Gustin v. Chaney

2006 Ohio 6509

Opinion

[Cite as Gustin v. Chaney, 112 Ohio St.3d 102, 2006-Ohio-6509.]

GUSTIN ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CHANEY ET AL, APPELLANTS. [Cite as Gustin v. Chaney, 112 Ohio St.3d 102, 2006-Ohio-6509.] Evidence — Damages — Collateral-source rule — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of Robinson v. Bates. (No. 2006-0655 — Submitted November 15, 2006 — Decided December 27, 2006.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Highland County, No. 05CA7, 2006-Ohio-1049. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Robinson v. Bates, 112 Ohio St.3d 17, 2006-Ohio-6362, 857 N.E.2d 1195. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. __________________ Gary D. Ostendarp and Paul N. Herdman, for appellees. Droder & Miller Co., L.P.A., Bradley A. Powell, and Jeffrey T. Kenney, for appellants. ______________________