Gustavus J. Esselen, Inc. v. Visor
180 Misc. 537, 45 N.Y.S.2d 258, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2606
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJune 10, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 180 Misc. 537 (Gustavus J. Esselen, Inc. v. Visor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gustavus J. Esselen, Inc. v. Visor, 180 Misc. 537, 45 N.Y.S.2d 258, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2606 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).
Opinion
The default was neither intentional nor willful. It was improper to require the filing of cash or a bond as a condition for opening the default.
Order modified by striking therefrom the condition for giving cash security or surety bond, and as modified affirmed. Case set down for trial for June 18, 1943.
Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Aiello v. Baldasare
17 Misc. 2d 449 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Gallagher v. Tantalo
10 Misc. 2d 1029 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Heiland v. Salm
208 Misc. 474 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
180 Misc. 537, 45 N.Y.S.2d 258, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gustavus-j-esselen-inc-v-visor-nyappterm-1943.