Gustavus J. Esselen, Inc. v. Visor
180 Misc. 537, 45 N.Y.S.2d 258, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2606
Opinion
The default was neither intentional nor willful. It was improper to require the filing of cash or a bond as a condition for opening the default.
Order modified by striking therefrom the condition for giving cash security or surety bond, and as modified affirmed. Case set down for trial for June 18, 1943.
Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gustavus J. Esselen, Inc. v. Visor, 180 Misc. 537, 45 N.Y.S.2d 258, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2606 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).
180 Misc. 537 (Gustavus J. Esselen, Inc. v. Visor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aiello v. Baldasare
17 Misc. 2d 449 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Gallagher v. Tantalo
10 Misc. 2d 1029 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Heiland v. Salm
208 Misc. 474 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)