Gustavo Tijerina Sandoval v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 23, 2021·No. 13-18-00392-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-18-00392-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

GUSTAVO TIJERINA SANDOVAL, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee.

On appeal from the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

ORDER Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the State’s unopposed motion to stay the

proceedings in this Court.

Appellant was convicted in the trial court of two counts: count one imposed the

death penalty and is on direct appeal with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, see TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 37.071(h); TEX. R. APP. P. 71.1. Count two imposed a sentence of life imprisonment and is before this Court. Appellant has filed briefs in both the court of

criminal appeals and this Court on his conviction.

The State has come before this Court asking us to stay the appeal before us

because appellant’s briefs have points of error that overlap and the court of criminal

appeals’ disposition could be dispositive of those points of error. Appellant’s counsel has

indicated to the State that they have no opposition to the request.

The Court, having fully examined and considered the State’s request to stay

GRANTS the motion and ABATES the current appeal before this Court. The parties are

ordered to notify this Court when the court of criminal appeals issues its opinion on

appellant’s direct appeal in order for this proceeding to be reinstated.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 23rd the day of February 2021.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gustavo Tijerina Sandoval v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Gustavo Tijerina Sandoval v. State (Gustavo Tijerina Sandoval v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.