Gustavo Rodriguez De La Garza v. State
This text of Gustavo Rodriguez De La Garza v. State (Gustavo Rodriguez De La Garza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-15-00117-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
GUSTAVO RODRIGUEZ DE LA GARZA, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On Appeal from the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.
ORDER ABATING APPEAL Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Longoria Order Per Curiam
On May 21, 2015, appellant’s counsel filed a motion to dismiss this appeal;
however, the motion was not signed by appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a) (allowing
the voluntary dismissal of a criminal appeal but requiring “appellant and his or her
attorney” to sign the motion to dismiss). According to subsequent communications with
appellant’s counsel, appellant has been released from custody and counsel has been unable to locate him.
This sequence of events requires us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further
delay and to preserve the parties' rights. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(1). Accordingly,
this appeal is ABATED and the cause REMANDED to the trial court. Upon remand, the
trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make appropriate findings and
recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether appellant can be located; (2)
whether appellant has abandoned his appeal; and (3) if any other orders are necessary
to ensure the proper and timely pursuit of appellant’s appeal.
The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any
orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental
clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record
of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental
reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court within thirty days from
the date of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 3rd day of September, 2015.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gustavo Rodriguez De La Garza v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gustavo-rodriguez-de-la-garza-v-state-texapp-2015.