Gustavo Nicholas Flores-Mancha v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 24, 2015
Docket04-15-00092-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Gustavo Nicholas Flores-Mancha v. State (Gustavo Nicholas Flores-Mancha v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gustavo Nicholas Flores-Mancha v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 24, 2015

No. 04-15-00092-CR

Gustavo Nicholas FLORES-MANCHA, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014CR7678 Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant entered into a plea bargain with the State, pursuant to which appellant pled guilty to the offense of sexual assault. The trial court imposed sentence in accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s rule 25.2(a)(2) certification and a written plea bargain agreement, has been filed. See id. R. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id.

The clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. R. 25.2(a)(2). The record also appears to support the trial court’s certification that appellant does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate).

Appellant is hereby given notice that this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless an amended certification showing that appellant has the right to appeal is made part of the appellate record by March 26, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). We order all appellate deadlines are suspended until further order of the court. We further order the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on the attorneys of record and the court reporter.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 24th day of February, 2015.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gustavo Nicholas Flores-Mancha v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gustavo-nicholas-flores-mancha-v-state-texapp-2015.