Gustavo Mendoza v. Loretta E. Lynch

674 F. App'x 588
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 3, 2017
Docket16-1079
StatusUnpublished

This text of 674 F. App'x 588 (Gustavo Mendoza v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gustavo Mendoza v. Loretta E. Lynch, 674 F. App'x 588 (8th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Honduran citizens and siblings Gustavo and Pedro Lizardo Mendoza petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s (IJ’s) denial of their applications for asylum and withholding of removal. 1 After careful consideration, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the decision. See Garcia-Milian v. Lynch, 825 F.3d 943, 945 (8th Cir. 2016). The petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The IJ also denied protection under the Convention Against Torture, but that ruling is not before this court. See Chay-Velasquez v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 751, 756 (8th Cir. 2004).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
674 F. App'x 588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gustavo-mendoza-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca8-2017.