Gustavo Barada Huertas v. State of Florida
This text of Gustavo Barada Huertas v. State of Florida (Gustavo Barada Huertas v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 5D2024-2489 LT Case No. 2023-303892-CF _____________________________
GUSTAVO BARADA HUERTAS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County. Kathryn D. Weston, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Victoria Rose Cordero, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard A. Pallas, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
June 24, 2025
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Parks v. State, 50 Fla. L. Weekly S120 (Fla. June 12, 2025) (holding “that the minimum ‘[c]osts for the state attorney’ mandated by section 938.27(8) must be imposed by the trial court even in the absence of a request by the State.”). EDWARDS, C.J., and MAKAR and SOUD, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gustavo Barada Huertas v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gustavo-barada-huertas-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.