Gustaveson v. Otis
27 N.Y.S. 280, 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 611, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 797
This text of 27 N.Y.S. 280 (Gustaveson v. Otis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gustaveson v. Otis, 27 N.Y.S. 280, 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 611, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 797 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).
Opinion
So much of the motion as asks that the complaint should be made more definite and certain, by including a •definite description of the premises alleged to have been occupied, should have been granted. The order should be reversed, and motion granted to this extent, with $10 costs and disbursements, to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
27 N.Y.S. 280, 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 611, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gustaveson-v-otis-nysupct-1894.