Gustave v. SBE ENT HOLDINGS, LLC

District Court, S.D. Florida·Decided September 7, 2022·No. 1:19-cv-23961·Unknown

Opinion

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Deceide Gustave and others, ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Civil Action No. 19-23961-Civ-Scola SBE ENT Holdings, LLC and ) others, Defendants. ) Order Adopting the Magistrate Judge’s Report And Recommendation Neither party has objected to Magistrate Judge Torres’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 201) concerning the Plaintiffs motion for supplemental judgment (ECF No. 188) and the time to do so has passed. A district court need conduct a de novo review of only “those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636. Where no objections are made, a report may be adopted in full without conducting de novo review provided no plain error exists. E.g., id.; Menendez v. Naples Cmty. Hosp., Inc., No. 2:20-CV-898- SPC-MRM, 2021 WL 5178496, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 8, 2021) (collecting cases). Finding no plain error with Judge Torres’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 201), the Court adopts it in full. Accordingly, the Court grants in part and denies in part the Plaintiffs motion (ECF No. 188). The Plaintiff is hereby awarded post-judgment interest in the amount of $205.81, for which let execution lie. All other interest or fees requested in the motion is denied. Any other pending motions are denied as moot. This case will remain closed. Done and ordered at Miami, Florida, on September 7, 2022.

United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gustave v. SBE ENT HOLDINGS, LLC, (S.D. Fla. 2022).

Gustave v. SBE ENT HOLDINGS, LLC (Gustave v. SBE ENT HOLDINGS, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related