Gustave J. Labarre, Jr. v. Occidental Chemical Company
This text of Gustave J. Labarre, Jr. v. Occidental Chemical Company (Gustave J. Labarre, Jr. v. Occidental Chemical Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
STATE OF LOUISIANA
a COURT OF APPEAL
FIRST CIRCUIT
2019 CA 0624
J GUSTAVE J. LABARRE, JR., ET AL.
VERSUS OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, ET AL.
Judgment Rendered. - FEB 19 2020 X iXXX'. 7C 7C
Appealed from the 23rd Judicial District Court In and for the Parish of Assumption State of Louisiana Case No. 33796
The Honorable Jason Verdigets, Judge Presiding
Leopold Z. Sher Counsel for James M. Garner Defendant/Third- Party Peter L. Hilbert, Jr. Plaintiff/Appellant Christopher T. Chocheles Texas Brine Company, LLC Jeffrey D. Kessler David A. Freedman New Orleans, Louisiana
Robert Ryland Percy, III Travis J. Turner Gonzales, Louisiana
Dane S. Ciolino Metairie, Louisiana
James E. Kuhn Ponchatula, Louisiana Matthew J. Randazzo, III Counsel for Christopher B. Bailey Third -Party Defendants/ Appellees Will Montz Browning Oil Company, Inc., Lafayette, Louisiana LORCA Corporation, and
Colorado Crude Company
Joseph L. Shea, Jr. Counsel for Katherine Smith Baker Third -Party Defendant/Appellee Ashley G. Gable Reliance Petroleum Corporation Joshua S. Chevallier Shreveport, Louisiana
Frank H. Spruiell, Jr. Counsel for Reid A. Jones Third -Party Defendant/Appellee Seth M. Moyers Sol Kirschner Anna W. O' Neal Shreveport, Louisiana
X C 7C J? CX C
BEFORE: WELCH, LANIER, AND BURRIS, JJ.'
Judge William J. Burris, retired, is serving pro tempere by special appointment of the Louisiana Supreme Court.
2 LANIER, J.
This dispute is one of many arising out of the August 2012 sinkhole that
appeared near Bayou Corne in Assumption Parish. This appeal relates to a
challenge to the trial court' s dismissal of the third -party demands by Texas Brine
Company, LLC (" Texas Brine") against multiple parties, including the third -party
defendants herein, Reliance Petroleum Corporation, Browning Oil Company, Inc.,
LORCA Corporation, Colorado Crude Company, and Sol Kirschner ( collectively,
the oil and gas parties"), based on res judicata and collateral estoppel. The same
issue was recently decided by this court in a related appeal that originated out of a
different trial court number ( No. 34270, 23rd Judicial District Court, Assumption
Parish), but was rendered by the same trial court judge on the same date,
concerning the same oil and gas parties and Texas Brine. See Marchand v. Texas
Brine Company, LLC, 2019- 0052 ( La. App. 1 Cir. 12/ 27/ 19), So. 3d ,
2019 WL 7206880. 2
In Marchand, this court affirmed the trial court's judgment sustaining the
exceptions of res judicata and collateral estoppel filed by the oil and gas parties,
and the dismissal, with prejudice, of Texas Brine's third -party demands against the
oil and gas parties. Marchand, So. 3d at , 2019 WL 7206880, at * 2- 3.
After a thorough review of the record, we find no material distinctions between the
evidence and arguments asserted in this appeal and those presented in the
Marchand appeal. The exact same background, issues, and assignments of error
raised by Texas Brine in this case have already been thoroughly discussed in
Marchand, which we are bound to follow under the " law of the circuit doctrine"
that requires us to follow our prior decisions. Pontchartrain Natural Gas System
2 The main difference between the related Marchand appeal and the instant appeal is that there are different pipeline plaintiffs in the case sub judice. This appeal, however, does not concern the pipeline plaintiffs.
3 v. Texas Brine Company, LLC, 2018- 0001 ( La. App. 1 Cir. 6/ 4/ 18), 253 So. 3d
156, writ denied, 2018- 1124 ( La. 9/ 28/ 18), 253 So. 3d 147.
We issue this summary disposition in accordance with Uniform Rules—
Courts of Appeal, Rule 2- 16. 2( A)(2), ( 4), and ( 6), and affirm the trial court's July
16, 2018 judgment sustaining the exception raising the objections of res judicata
and collateral estoppel and dismissing, with prejudice, Texas Brine's third -party
demands against Reliance Petroleum Corporation, Browning Oil Company, Inc.,
LORCA Corporation, Colorado Crude Company, and Sol Kirschner. All costs of
this appeal are assessed to Texas Brine Company, LLC.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gustave J. Labarre, Jr. v. Occidental Chemical Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gustave-j-labarre-jr-v-occidental-chemical-company-lactapp-2020.