Gustafson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Gustafson v. State

287 So. 2d 69

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedDecember 19, 1973

DocketNo. 43704

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 287 So. 2d 69 (Gustafson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gustafson v. State, 287 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari directed to the 4th District’s opinion reported at 273 So.2d 86 (1973), reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3) (1973), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby

Discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur. ERVIN and McCAIN, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari directed to the 4th District’s opinion reported at 273 So.2d 86 (1973), reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3) (1973), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby

Discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur. ERVIN and McCAIN, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 So. 2d 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gustafson-v-state-fla-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack