Gustafson v. State

287 So. 2d 69
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 19, 1973·No. No. 43704·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari directed to the 4th District’s opinion reported at 273 So.2d 86 (1973), reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3) (1973), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby

Discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur. ERVIN and McCAIN, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gustafson v. State, 287 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 1973).

287 So. 2d 69 (Gustafson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. State
328 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)