Gustafson v. Eger

85 N.W. 1082, 126 Mich. 454, 1901 Mich. LEXIS 754
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gustafson v. Eger. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Mich. 387
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 7, 1901·Published

Opinion

Montgomery, C. J.

This case presents a contest over the will of Augusta D. Gustafson, deceased. The will was contested on the ground of mental incapacity and undue influence. The circuit judge directed a verdict sustaining the will, and contestants have brought the case here for review on error.

When the evidence shows conclusively that deceased possessed sufficient capacity to make a will, and when the record fails to show undue influence, it is entirely proper for the trial court to direct a verdict. O'Connor v. Madison, 98 Mich. 183 (57 N. W. 105). Inasmuch as,, upon a careful reading of the record, we are all agreed that the state of the record justifies the action taken by the circuit judge in this case, we do not deem it of advantage to the profession to enter into a detailed statement of the evidence adduced on the trial.

The judgment will be affirmed.

. The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gustafson v. Eger, 85 N.W. 1082, 126 Mich. 454, 1901 Mich. LEXIS 754 (Mich. 1901).

85 N.W. 1082 (Gustafson v. Eger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Connor v. Madison
57 N.W. 105 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1893)