Gust v. Tolson

Fourth Circuit

Gust v. Tolson

204 F. App'x 179

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 2, 2006·No. No. 06-1597·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Thomas E. Gust, Bryon W. Sisk, Roger C. Howard, Todd Leopard, Michael Miranda, Herman G. Shamel, Jr., David L. Biles, and Thomas J. Squirek appeal the district court’s order granting Appellees’ motions to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gust v. Tolson, No. 3:05-cv-00444, 2006 WL 1215414 (W.D.N.C. May 9, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Thomas E. Gust, Bryon W. Sisk, Roger C. Howard, Todd Leopard, Michael Miranda, Herman G. Shamel, Jr., David L. Biles, and Thomas J. Squirek appeal the district court’s order granting Appellees’ motions to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gust v. Tolson, No. 3:05-cv-00444, 2006 WL 1215414 (W.D.N.C. May 9, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Gust v. Tolson, 204 F. App'x 179 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

204 F. App'x 179 (Gust v. Tolson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.