Gushue v. Estate of Levy

118 A.D.3d 415, 986 N.Y.S.2d 478
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 3, 2014·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey K. Oing, J), entered September 28, 2012, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff claims that she developed Parkinson’s disease due to exposure to manganese fumes. However, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact to rebut defendants’ prima facie showing that there is no general causation (see Cornell v 360 W. 51st St. Realty, LLC, 22 NY3d 762 [2014]). The scientific evidence indicates that manganese exposure can indeed cause a related but distinct disorder called manganese-induced Parkinsonism, or manganism, but it does not show that manganese exposure can lead to the specific injury claimed, Parkinson’s disease.

Concur—Saxe, J.E, Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Feinman and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gushue v. Estate of Levy, 118 A.D.3d 415, 986 N.Y.S.2d 478 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

118 A.D.3d 415 (Gushue v. Estate of Levy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Linde v. Charles B. Chrystal Co., Inc
2026 NY Slip Op 50338(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2026)
Widercrantz v. Amchem Prods., Inc.
2025 NY Slip Op 51913(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)