Gus Kaplan, Inc. v. D.H. Holmes Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Gus Kaplan, Inc. v. D.H. Holmes Co.

563 So. 2d 870, 1990 La. LEXIS 1296, 1990 WL 69115

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 25, 1990

DocketNo. 90-CC-0899

StatusPublished

This text of 563 So. 2d 870 (Gus Kaplan, Inc. v. D.H. Holmes Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gus Kaplan, Inc. v. D.H. Holmes Co., 563 So. 2d 870, 1990 La. LEXIS 1296, 1990 WL 69115 (La. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In re D.H. Holmes Co. Ltd.; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 154910; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW90-0292.

Granted. Reversed. It appears that the evidence may be relevant and admissible under certain circumstances. The trial judge is ordered to rule on the evidentiary questions as the evidence is offered at trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re D.H. Holmes Co. Ltd.; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 154910; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW90-0292.

Granted. Reversed. It appears that the evidence may be relevant and admissible under certain circumstances. The trial judge is ordered to rule on the evidentiary questions as the evidence is offered at trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

563 So. 2d 870, 1990 La. LEXIS 1296, 1990 WL 69115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gus-kaplan-inc-v-dh-holmes-co-la-1990.