Gus H. (Trey) Comiskey, III v. H. David Ramm, Waterside Construction LLC and WSD Construction, LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 28, 2020·No. 01-19-00679-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued January 28, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before

the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug.

28, 2015). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant

did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for nonpayment of all required

fees. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as

moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Goodman, and Countiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gus H. (Trey) Comiskey, III v. H. David Ramm, Waterside Construction LLC and WSD Construction, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Gus H. (Trey) Comiskey, III v. H. David Ramm, Waterside Construction LLC and WSD Construction, LLC (Gus H. (Trey) Comiskey, III v. H. David Ramm, Waterside Construction LLC and WSD Construction, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.