Gus H. (Trey) Comiskey, III v. H. David Ramm, Waterside Construction LLC and WSD Construction, LLC
Opinion
Opinion issued January 28, 2020
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before
the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug.
28, 2015). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant
did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for nonpayment of all required
fees. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as
moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Goodman, and Countiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gus H. (Trey) Comiskey, III v. H. David Ramm, Waterside Construction LLC and WSD Construction, LLC (Gus H. (Trey) Comiskey, III v. H. David Ramm, Waterside Construction LLC and WSD Construction, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.