Gurwitz v. Weir
This text of 127 A.D. 352 (Gurwitz v. Weir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff has recovered a judgment for $167.50 for goods shipped by him by the defendant express company and lost by it. It is enough that the plaintiff did not own the goods. . He received them by express for inspection and to be returned to the sender within five days if they did not suit him, and he returned them by the defendant.. The person to bring the suit is the owner (Sweet v. Barney, 23 N. Y. 335; Krulder v. Ellison, 47 id. 36).
The judgment must be reversed.
Woodward, Jenks, Hooker and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Judgment and order of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered; costs to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 A.D. 352, 111 N.Y.S. 557, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gurwitz-v-weir-nyappdiv-1908.