Gurule v. Social Security Administration
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO MARY E. GURULE, Plaintiff, vs. KILOLO KIJAKAZL No. 1:20-cv-01045-KWR-GBW Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO REMAND THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Reverse and Remand for Further Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Doc. 30. Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand under that sentence, this Court hereby GRANTS the Motion, REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and REMANDS the underlying social security application(s) to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-97 (1993). IT IS SO ORDERED. ‘
KEA IGGS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gurule v. Social Security Administration (Gurule v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.