Gurstein v. Bard College

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gurstein v. Bard College

280 A.D.2d 264, 720 N.Y.S.2d 125, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 921

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 1, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 280 A.D.2d 264 (Gurstein v. Bard College) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gurstein v. Bard College, 280 A.D.2d 264, 720 N.Y.S.2d 125, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered March 20, 2000, dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to vacate a determination of respondent terminating petitioner’s employment as an assistant professor on a tenure track, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record supports the finding that respondent substantially complied with its stated guidelines during the completion of petitioner’s pre-tenure review (see, Matter of Loebl v New York Univ., 255 AD2d 257). The evidence sufficiently establishes that respondent’s guidelines were substantially complied with and that the five required letters of evaluation were submitted to the President of Bard College as part of petitioner’s completed dossier. We have reviewed petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered March 20, 2000, dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to vacate a determination of respondent terminating petitioner’s employment as an assistant professor on a tenure track, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record supports the finding that respondent substantially complied with its stated guidelines during the completion of petitioner’s pre-tenure review (see, Matter of Loebl v New York Univ., 255 AD2d 257). The evidence sufficiently establishes that respondent’s guidelines were substantially complied with and that the five required letters of evaluation were submitted to the President of Bard College as part of petitioner’s completed dossier. We have reviewed petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 A.D.2d 264, 720 N.Y.S.2d 125, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gurstein-v-bard-college-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack