Gurstein v. Bard College

280 A.D.2d 264, 720 N.Y.S.2d 125, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 921
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 1, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered March 20, 2000, dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to vacate a determination of respondent terminating petitioner’s employment as an assistant professor on a tenure track, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record supports the finding that respondent substantially complied with its stated guidelines during the completion of petitioner’s pre-tenure review (see, Matter of Loebl v New York Univ., 255 AD2d 257). The evidence sufficiently establishes that respondent’s guidelines were substantially complied with and that the five required letters of evaluation were submitted to the President of Bard College as part of petitioner’s completed dossier. We have reviewed petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gurstein v. Bard College, 280 A.D.2d 264, 720 N.Y.S.2d 125, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

280 A.D.2d 264 (Gurstein v. Bard College) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Vengalattore v. Cornell Univ.
2018 NY Slip Op 3409 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Fruehwald v. Hofstra University
82 A.D.3d 1233 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)