Gurrieri v. 111 Livingston, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gurrieri v. 111 Livingston, LLC

6 A.D.3d 497, 774 N.Y.S.2d 418

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 12, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 A.D.3d 497 (Gurrieri v. 111 Livingston, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gurrieri v. 111 Livingston, LLC, 6 A.D.3d 497, 774 N.Y.S.2d 418 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J.), dated April 30, 2003, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff worked for an agency located on the 20th floor of an office building owned by the defendant. She allegedly was injured during a fire drill while stepping over construction debris, paint cans, sheet rock, and other hazardous materials on a landing in a stairwell. The plaintiff commenced this action seeking to recover damages for her injuries, claiming that the defendant was negligent in its maintenance of the stairwell.

The defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]) by demonstrating that the existence of a dangerous condition, if any, in the stairwell, was not a proximate cause of the plaintiffs injuries (see Sorrentino v Wild, 224 AD2d 607 [1996]; Fleischer v Nieberg Midwood Chapel, 33 AD2d 521 [1969]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Santucci, J.P., S. Miller, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J.), dated April 30, 2003, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff worked for an agency located on the 20th floor of an office building owned by the defendant. She allegedly was injured during a fire drill while stepping over construction debris, paint cans, sheet rock, and other hazardous materials on a landing in a stairwell. The plaintiff commenced this action seeking to recover damages for her injuries, claiming that the defendant was negligent in its maintenance of the stairwell.

The defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]) by demonstrating that the existence of a dangerous condition, if any, in the stairwell, was not a proximate cause of the plaintiffs injuries (see Sorrentino v Wild, 224 AD2d 607 [1996]; Fleischer v Nieberg Midwood Chapel, 33 AD2d 521 [1969]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Santucci, J.P., S. Miller, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.3d 497, 774 N.Y.S.2d 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gurrieri-v-111-livingston-llc-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack