Gurney v. State Ex Rel. Landis

168 So. 245, 124 Fla. 280
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 14, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 168 So. 245 (Gurney v. State Ex Rel. Landis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gurney v. State Ex Rel. Landis, 168 So. 245, 124 Fla. 280 (Fla. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case Mr. Chief Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Davis are of the opinion that the judgment of the Circuit Court should be reversed, while Mr. Presiding Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the said judgment should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton, v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. Rep. 51, that the judgment of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)
Griffith v. Alcocke
37 So. 47 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 So. 245, 124 Fla. 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gurney-v-state-ex-rel-landis-fla-1936.