Gurney v. Sharp

New York Court of Common Pleas

Gurney v. Sharp

17 Abb. Pr. 410

DecidedApril 15, 1864

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Abb. Pr. 410 (Gurney v. Sharp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gurney v. Sharp, 17 Abb. Pr. 410 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1864).

Pincite

Opinion

Brady, J.

The parties to this action, by their respective [411]*411counsel, having attended to argue the appeal taken, on the case made, and no notice of any irregularity having been given, I think that the order denying a new trial at special term should be entered nunc pro tunc / but with the proviso that the appeal herein shall be argued when called at the present term, and that the plaintiff have $10 costs of this motion, to abide the event of the appeal;—the appeal to be heard upon the case, already served, so that no delay may take place.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brady, J.

The parties to this action, by their respective [411]*411counsel, having attended to argue the appeal taken, on the case made, and no notice of any irregularity having been given, I think that the order denying a new trial at special term should be entered nunc pro tunc / but with the proviso that the appeal herein shall be argued when called at the present term, and that the plaintiff have $10 costs of this motion, to abide the event of the appeal;—the appeal to be heard upon the case, already served, so that no delay may take place.

Ordered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Abb. Pr. 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gurney-v-sharp-nyctcompl-1864.