Gurney, Becker & Bourne, Inc. v. Simon
This text of 89 A.D.2d 795 (Gurney, Becker & Bourne, Inc. v. Simon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed, without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: The complaint alleges that plaintiff, a licensed real estate brokerage, entered into an oral agreement with defendant whereby defendant was to pay plaintiff brokerage commissions over a 10-year period as a percentage of rent on premises owned by defendant for which plaintiff had obtained a lessee. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 5) was properly granted by the City Court of Lackawanna on the ground that the oral agreement was unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds (General Obligations Law, § 5-701, subd a, par 1). County Court reversed, erroneously concluding that section 5-701 (subd a, par 10), which contains an exception for real estate brokers, was controlling and that the agreement was thus enforceable. County Court’s determination that paragraphs 1 and 10 are mutually exclusive and that 10 applies in this situation has no support in the law (see Biskind & Barasch, Law of Real Estate Brokers, § 67, p 164; see, also, Babtkis Assoc. v Tarazi Realty Corp., 34 AD2d 754). (Appeal from order of Erie County Court, La Mendola, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 A.D.2d 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gurney-becker-bourne-inc-v-simon-nyappdiv-1982.