Gurnee v. Northern Radiology Associates, P.C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gurnee v. Northern Radiology Associates, P.C.

241 A.D.2d 922, 661 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7855

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 3, 1997·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs timely commenced this medical malpractice action by filing a summons and complaint on January 17, 1995. Plaintiffs were unable to effect personal service because Allen J. Ball, M.D. (defendant), had retired from the practice of medicine and moved from New York. They obtained an order allowing service upon defendant by publication. Anticipating that they would be unable to effect service within 120 days following filing of the summons and complaint, plaintiffs commenced a second action before the 120-day period had expired by filing the summons and complaint, paying a second filing fee and. obtaining a new index number.

Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant to dismiss the second action. Although plaintiffs commenced the second action before the first action was deemed dismissed (see, CPLR 306-b [a]), we agree with the court that the premature refiling of the complaint should be treated as a mere irregularity that does not deprive the court of jurisdiction (see, Latin v Articoli Diamantati Affini, 160 Misc 2d 457, 459). To the extent that Alcide v Westchester County Med. Ctr. (234 AD2d 239) holds otherwise, we decline to follow it.

We have examined defendant’s remaining argument and conclude that it is without merit. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J.—Dismiss Action.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs timely commenced this medical malpractice action by filing a summons and complaint on January 17, 1995. Plaintiffs were unable to effect personal service because Allen J. Ball, M.D. (defendant), had retired from the practice of medicine and moved from New York. They obtained an order allowing service upon defendant by publication. Anticipating that they would be unable to effect service within 120 days following filing of the summons and complaint, plaintiffs commenced a second action before the 120-day period had expired by filing the summons and complaint, paying a second filing fee and. obtaining a new index number.

Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant to dismiss the second action. Although plaintiffs commenced the second action before the first action was deemed dismissed (see, CPLR 306-b [a]), we agree with the court that the premature refiling of the complaint should be treated as a mere irregularity that does not deprive the court of jurisdiction (see, Latin v Articoli Diamantati Affini, 160 Misc 2d 457, 459). To the extent that Alcide v Westchester County Med. Ctr. (234 AD2d 239) holds otherwise, we decline to follow it.

We have examined defendant’s remaining argument and conclude that it is without merit. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J.—Dismiss Action.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Gurnee v. Northern Radiology Associates, P.C., 241 A.D.2d 922, 661 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

241 A.D.2d 922 (Gurnee v. Northern Radiology Associates, P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related