Gurge v. Agency of Canadian Car & Foundry Co.
267 A.D. 782, 45 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6232
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 1943·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
In an action to recover commissions pursuant to a written contract, plaintiff appeals from an order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denying plaintiff’s cross motion to amend the complaint and to add an additional party defendant, and from the judgment entered thereon. Order, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ. [See post, p. 878.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gurge v. Agency of Canadian Car & Foundry Co., 267 A.D. 782, 45 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6232 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).
267 A.D. 782 (Gurge v. Agency of Canadian Car & Foundry Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McGee v. Horvat
23 A.D.2d 271 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Briggs v. New York State Thruway Authority
28 Misc. 2d 110 (New York State Court of Claims, 1961)
Messineo v. Kletz
16 Misc. 2d 624 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Horowitz v. Kempner
8 Misc. 2d 462 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Blessington v. McCrory Stores Corp.
195 Misc. 710 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)