Gurganus v. Commonwealth
519 S.E.2d 421, 30 Va. App. 707, 1999 Va. App. LEXIS 572
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gurganus v. Commonwealth. Read the opinion of the Court — 29 Va. App. 494 →
Opinion
[708]*708UPON A REHEARING EN BANC
Upon a rehearing en banc, the stay of this Court’s April 20, 1999 mandate is lifted, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with the majority opinion of a panel of this Court in Gurganus v. Commonwealth, 29 Va.App. 494, 513 S.E.2d 427 (1999).
Judges BENTON and ELDER dissent for those reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of the panel.
This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gurganus v. Commonwealth, 519 S.E.2d 421, 30 Va. App. 707, 1999 Va. App. LEXIS 572 (Va. Ct. App. 1999).
519 S.E.2d 421 (Gurganus v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gurganus v. Commonwealth
513 S.E.2d 427 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1999)